As a result of the advertising for legal services that you see on television, it’s easy to believe that everyone who has ever been in an accident will be mistreated by the insurance company and will need the assistance of a lawyer to make things right.
In the vast majority of circumstances, an Atlanta car accident lawyer carries out their obligations precisely as they should.
There are times when the services of an attorney are important, but there are other times when they aren’t required at all.
Consider the following instances in which you may not need the services of an attorney in the aftermath of a car accident.
No One Was Injured
There are situations when the only damage is done to the physical structure of the building. Consider the scenario that no one was in either of the two automobiles involved in the collision at the time when the accident occurred.
One agitated dog and a poor gear shifter might cause your car to be engaged in a two-vehicle collision with no humans on the scene. According to insurance adjusters, “abnormal events” do occur.
If It Is Probable That The Dispute Will Wind Up In Small Claims Court
Additional instances exist in which the expected compensation is so little that the lawsuit must be brought in small claims court.
As a small-claims litigant, you have the right to the representation of an attorney in your case. Because the expected recovery is so little, the law firm will almost probably expect to be compensated rather than operating on a contingency, as is customary. Situational considerations have an important influence.
If You Get An Offer From Your Insurance Carrier That You Feel Is Acceptable
Given that the insurance company is willing to settle, you’ll need to perform a little maths to figure out how much you’ll get.
We strongly advise against ending yourself in a situation where you have to negotiate for a longer amount of time and then pay up one-third of your compensation if the insurance company has already decided to accept a settlement offer. Do you think their offer is satisfactory?
It may be necessary to hire an attorney if your insurance company is being unhelpful or refuses to acknowledge the full scope of your claim.
For an attorney to be worth his or her fee, he or she must win your case for more than double the amount of money you expect to get in compensation.
Believe it or not, most attorneys will advise you if it is more cost-effective to hire a lawyer or to settle your case out of court. The ideal place to bring up this subject is during a consultation with an attorney.
Keep in mind that many law firms provide consultations at no cost and with no commitment. The benefit of receiving an outside perspective cannot be overstated.
In certain situations, accepting the insurance company’s compensation and moving on with your life may be in your best interests. If this is the case, consult with an attorney.
Having to deal with an attorney throughout the claims process is not always worth it in certain situations.
To be assured that nothing unexpected will occur, however, a high degree of assurance in this regard is required. In most cases, after you’ve signed a contract, you’re out of luck when it comes to receiving further funds.
An insurance company or the defendant’s counsel may be found to have exploited the plaintiff in the rare case that a court rules in the plaintiff’s favour and the settlement is thrown out. To achieve this condition, a substantial amount of evidence must be presented.
If you have been injured or involved in an accident, don’t be hesitant to seek counsel from others before filing a claim with the insurance company.
If your case does not involve significant long-term threats or expected reimbursement, you may be better off settling with the insurance company and going on with your life.